Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
UKHC010010022018
2026:UHC:6829 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s
order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
WPMS/976/2018
Smt. Lalita Chauhan & Others --Petitioners Versus Smt. Premvati & Another --Respondents
Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.
Mr. Aditya Singh, Advocate, for the petitioners.
(2) Petitioners are defendants in a suit for permanent prohibitory injunction. Plaintiff to the said suit moved an application under
Order 6 Rule 17 CPC, seeking leave to amend the plaint. Application filed by the plaintiff was rejected by the Trial Court, however Revisional Court allowed the revision, filed by the plaintiff, and granted leave to amend the plaint. Thus feeling aggrieved by the order passed by the Revisional Court on 19.9.2016, petitioners have approached this Court.
(3) As per the communication received from 1st Additional Civil Judge (Sr. Div.), Haridwar, Original Suit No. 249 of 2010, Smt. Premvati v. Natthu Ram, was decided on
31.8.2024.
(4) Since the suit itself has been decided, therefore, challenge to the order passed by the Revisional Court, whereby leave to amend the plaint was granted, do not survive. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
(Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.)
4.8.2026 Pr PRABODH KUMAR Digitally signed by PRABODH KUMAR DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3a082a00a95aff911a9559743af8f21c50602ff6eae4e61af3aeab198d462503, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=0DC111E8D8CA66E16B940EFDF806ACCC1AB588052DF6FCA58C67F3C91957BE53, cn=PRABODH KUMAR Date: 2026.08.04 17:57:07 +05'30'
UKHC010010022018
2026:UHC:6829