HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 13692 of 2026 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. This is plaintiff's petition. 2. The suit filed by plaintiff was dismissed for want of prosecution. An application under Order IX Rule 4 CPC was moved for restoring the said case, which is pending consideration. The sole prayer made in the writ petition is for expeditious disposal of the same. 3. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, the writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit or issuing notice to private respondents, with a direction upon court concerned to decide the restoration application dated 11.07.2023 filed under Order IX Rule 4 CPC in Case No. 1327 of 2020, in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. 4. With the aforesaid directions, writ petition stands disposed of. 5. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the matter on merits. September 30, 2026 (V. S. SINGH) Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shailesh Kumar Mishra, Vinay Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Tara Devi .....Petitioner(s) Brijesh Singh And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VIDYA SAGAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad