Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10143 (BOM)

DADARAO SATVARAO MHASKE v. STATE OF MAH and ANR

CP/123/2009 · 2026-09-21

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

123.2009CP 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 2 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 123 OF 2009 IN WP/1468/2006 Dadarao Satvarao Mhaske VERSUS State of Maharashtra and another ... Mr. Valmik S. Munjal h/f Mr. B.S. Kudale, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr.S.J. Salgare, AGP for Respondent/State ... CORAM : VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV,J. DATE : 21.09.2026 P.C. : 1. Learned Advocate holding for Mr. Kudale, learned Advocate for the petitioner, though requested for time, but the affidavit in reply is filed by respondent no.1 - Collector and respondent no.2 - Special Land Acquisition Officer stating that the application under Section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act is disposed of by giving enhancement of compensation of Rs.89,753/- in favour of the petitioner. 2. In view of the compliance of the order, nothing survives in the present contempt petition and the same stands disposed of. [VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV] JUDGE sga 2026:BHC-AUG:43086