Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
123.2009CP 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 2 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 123 OF 2009 IN WP/1468/2006 Dadarao Satvarao Mhaske VERSUS State of Maharashtra and another ... Mr. Valmik S. Munjal h/f Mr. B.S. Kudale, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr.S.J. Salgare, AGP for Respondent/State ...
CORAM :
VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV,J. DATE : 21.09.2026 P.C. :
1. Learned Advocate holding for Mr. Kudale, learned Advocate for the petitioner, though requested for time, but the affidavit in reply is filed by respondent no.1 - Collector and respondent no.2 - Special Land Acquisition Officer stating that the application under Section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act is disposed of by giving enhancement of compensation of Rs.89,753/- in favour of the petitioner.
2. In view of the compliance of the order, nothing survives in the present contempt petition and the same stands disposed of.
[VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV] JUDGE sga 2026:BHC-AUG:43086