[2026:RJ-JP:26268] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Second Bail Application No. 10398/2026 URN: CRLMB / 19270U / 2026 Javid S/o Sahab Khan, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Balraka, Police Station Brijnagar, District Deeg (Rajasthan) (At Present Accused Confined In Jail, Deeg). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Second Bail Application No. 10728/2026 URN: CRLMB / 19894U / 2026 Wasim S/o Aas Mohammad, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Jagdaka Police Station Brijnagar, District Deeg (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Deependra Yadav Mr. Sanjay Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA Order 13/07/2026 1. These instant second bail applications have been filed against the order of the learned trial Court dated 21.04.2026 on behalf of the accused-petitioners under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 100/2026 registered at Police Station [2026:RJ-JP:26268] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-10398/2026] Nagar, District Deeg, for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 319(2), 318(2), 318(4), 111(2)(a), 111(4), 111(5), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 313 and 61(2)(a) of BNS and Sections 66, 66-C and 66-D of IT Act. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case; that charge-sheet has already been filed. He also submits that the accused-petitioners are in custody since long and conclusion of trial will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused-petitioners behind the bars and, therefore, prays that the accused-petitioners may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused- petitioners hereinabove but concurs with the fact that there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioners. 4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for both the parties; that the charge-sheet has already been filed; that the accused-petitioners are in custody since 08.04.2026; that there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioners and trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused- petitioners on bail. 5. Therefore, these instant second bail applications under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused- petitioners Javid S/o Sahab Khan & Wasim S/o Aas [2026:RJ-JP:26268] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-10398/2026] Mohammad are ordered to be released on bail, provided each of them furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioners shall not involve themselves in any offence(s) during currency of the bail. 7. In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the applications against the accused-petitioners for cancellation of the bails before the concerned Court. 8. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail applications and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. 9. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J 72-73/HEENA