1 2026:CGHC:19998 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCRC No. 3444 of 2026 Babulal Ravi S/o Dasaru Ram Aged About 62 Years Occupation- Agriculture, R/o Village- Tivragudi (Ward No. 02), Thana And Tah.- Ramanujnagar, District- Surajpur (C.G.) ... Applicant versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through District Magistrate District Surajpur ---- Respondent (Cause title is taken from the CIS) ___________________________________________________________ For Applicant : Ms. Hamida Siddiqui, Advocate with Mr. Ritik Sharma, Advocate For State-Respondent : Mr. Dharmesh Srivastava, Dy. AG ___________________________________________________________ Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal Order on Board 29/04/2026 1. This is the first bail application filed under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 for grant of regular bail to the applicant who has been arrested in connection with Crime No.138/2025 registered at Police Station Ramanujnagar, District Surajpur (C.G.), for the offence punishable under Sections 109(1), 324(4), 103(1), 3(5) of VASANT KUMAR Digitally signed by VASANT KUMAR Date: 2026.04.30 15:05:22 +0530 2 BNS. 2. The brief facts of this case is that, complainant Puran Ravi has lodged a report that on 22.09.2025 at 6:00 pm when his niece Karan Ravi was sitting on the side of the Road, accused Narmada, Omprakash, Jaiprakash came and had fight with Karan Ravi, Triveni Ravi, and Raja Babu because of the groundnut in the field later on about at 11:00 pm the accused came from the front in their Bolero Vehicle CG 15 CQ 7043 at very high speed and intentionally dashed the Motorcycle of Triveni and Raja babu to killed them. As a result which, they received grievous injury and later on they died. As per prosecution, this offence was caused with common intention to kill diseased-Triveni and Raja Babu. 3. The matter was taken up for investigation and after completion of investigation, charge sheet was filed before the concerned court against the accused. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant contended that the applicant is an innocent and has been falsely implicated in the said case. She further contended that the applicant is not involved in crime in question. She further contended that the applicant is in jail since 24.09.2025 and the trial will take considerable time for its conclusion, therefore, the applicant may be released on bail. 5. Learned State Counsel opposes the submission made by learned 3 counsel for the applicant and submits that the applicant was involved in crime in question and driver of the offending vehicle Om Prakash and Babulal Ravi had intensionally dashed the motorcycle of Triveni and Raja Babu to kill them due to which Triveni and Raja Babu had died. Therefore, the applicant may not be released on bail. 6. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case diary. 7. Considering the facts of the case, submission made by learned counsel for the parties. From the bare perusal of the case diary, it is revealed that, sufficient grounds are being shown by the prosecution that the accused/applicant has involved in the aforesaid offence. Looking to the nature and gravity of the offence, granting bail to the accused/applicant does not appear to be justified. 8. Accordingly, the bail application of the applicant stands rejected. 9. Office is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information and compliance forthwith. Sd/- (Radhakishan Agrawal) Judge Vasant