[2026:RJ-JP:26799] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8419/2026 URN: CRLMB / 15341U / 2026 Totaram Urf Ballu S/o Prabhatilal, Age 37 Years, Resident Of Kesarpur, P.S. Sadar, Distt. Alwar (Raj.) (At Present Accused- Petitioner Confined In Central Jail Alwar) ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajesh Maharshi Mr. Devanshu Saini Ms. Vaishnavi Pareek For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA Order 15/07/2026 1. This instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the accused-petitioner against the order of learned trial Court dated 12.05.2026 under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 29/2026 registered at Police Station Aravali Vihar, District Alwar for the offence(s) under Section 318(4) of BNS and Section 66D of IT Act, in which charge-sheet has been filed under Sections 318(4), 112(2) & 61(2) of BNS and Section 66D of IT Act. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that accused-petitioner is behind the bars since long. He further submits that charge-sheet has been filed. He further submits that accused-petitioner has been involved on the basis of disclosure statements of co-accused Samudra Kashyap; that the [2026:RJ-JP:26799] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-8419/2026] alleged bank account which is used in the cyber crime is in the name of co-accused Samudra Kashyap as reflected in the charge- sheet; that nothing has been recovered at the instance of the accused-petitioner; conclusion of trial may take considerable time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused- petitioner behind the bars and, therefore, prays that the accused- petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the contentions put forth by the learned counsel for the accused-petitioner and submits that there are two criminal antecedents registered against the accused-petitioner. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record; considering the facts and circumstances of the case and rival contentions advanced by the learned counsel for both the parties; particularly keeping in view the fact that the accused-petitioner is in custody 05.04.2026; that charge-sheet has been filed; that accused-petitioner has been involved in this case on the basis of disclosure statements of co-accused Samudra Kashyap; that nothing has been recovered at the instance of the accused- petitioner; that trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 5. Therefore, this instant bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Totaram Urf Ballu S/o Prabhatilal is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. [2026:RJ-JP:26799] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-8419/2026] 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve himself in any offence(s) during currency of the bail. 7. In case of any breach of the aforementioned condition, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 8. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. 9. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court and Jail authorities through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J 32/SHIVANI