Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10135 (RAJ)

RAMAN AHIR S/O BHAWANI LAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/10514/2026 · 2026-07-14

Sangeeta Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:26672] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10514/2026 URN: CRLMB / 19508U / 2026 Raman Ahir S/o Bhawani Lal, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Surya Nagar Road, Jagpura, Police Station Ranpur, District Kota City, (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In Central Jail Kota, District Kota). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nitin Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA Order 14/07/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed against the order of the learned trial Court dated 01.07.2026 on behalf of the accused-petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 78/2026 registered at Police Station Ranpur, District Kota City for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 8, 15 and 18 of NDPS Act. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case; that charge-sheet has already been filed; that the accused-petitioner is in custody since long; that co-accused has already been enlarged on bail; that recovered contraband is below commercial quantity; that there are no criminal antecedents of similar nature registered against the accused-petitioner and conclusion of trial [2026:RJ-JP:26672] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-10514/2026] will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused-petitioner behind the bars and, therefore, prays that the accused-petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions preferred by learned counsel for the accused- petitioner hereinabove. It is further submitted that there is one criminal antecedent registered against the accused-petitioner under Sections 323, 341, 354 of IPC and under Section 3(2)(va) of SC/ST Act. Therefore, he should not be enlarged on bail. 4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and material available on record. Keeping in view the fact that the charge-sheet against the accused-petitioner has already been filed; that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 29.04.2026; that recovered contraband is below commercial quantity; that there are no criminal antecedents of similar nature registered against the accused-petitioner; that co-accused namely Vikram Bajya has already been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 03.06.2026 in S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7889/2026 and trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused- petitioner on bail. 5. Therefore, the instant bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Raman Ahir S/o Bhawani Lal is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial [2026:RJ-JP:26672] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-10514/2026] Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve himself in any offence(s) during currency of the bail. 7. In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 8. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. 9. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court and Jail Authorities through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J 82/KAVISH