VINAY AGARWAL S/O SHRI VIJAY AGARWAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/9578/2026 · 2026-07-15
Sangeeta Sharma
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10130 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10130 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:26959] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9578/2026 URN: CRLMB / 17784U / 2026 Vinay Agarwal S/o Shri Vijay Agarwal, Aged About 49 Years, R/o Plot No. 302, Akshat Kailash Apartment Vasant Marg, Thana Banipark, Jaipur. (Raj.) (Petitioner Is Confined In Central Jail Jaipur). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Neeraj Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA
Order 15/07/2026
1. The instant bail application has been filed against the order of learned Trial Court dated 01.05.2026 on behalf of the accused- petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 322/2019 registered at Police Station Sanganer, District Jaipur City (East) for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B IPC.
2.
Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case; that the charge-sheet has been filed; that the accused-petitioner is in custody since long. He also submits that no recovery has been made at the instance of the accused-petitioner; conclusion of trial will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused-petitioner behind the bars and, therefore,
[2026:RJ-JP:26959] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-9578/2026] prays that the accused-petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the accused- petitioner hereinabove and submits there are criminal antecedents registered against the accused-petitioner, therefore, the accused- petitioner may not be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 BNSS. 4. Heard and considered the submissions made at the Bar and perused the material available on record, the overall facts and circumstances of the case and the arguments put forth by learned counsel for both the parties; that the charge-sheet against the accused-petitioner has been filed; that the accused-petitioner is in custody since long; that similarly situated co-accused person Ganesh Ingole has already been enlarged on bail by the Co- ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 24.09.2021 in S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Third Bail Application No. 11132/2021 and other co-accused persons namely Amit Gupta, Satyanarayan and Bhawani Singh Shekhawat have already been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide orders dated 13.11.2019, 11.07.2019 and 08.09.2021 in S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application Nos. 13895/2019, 9160/2019 and 12365/2021; that no recovery has been made at the instance of the accused- petitioner; that the trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. [2026:RJ-JP:26959] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-9578/2026]
5. Therefore, the instant bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Vinay Agarwal S/o Shri Vijay Agarwal is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.
50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve himself in any offence(s) during currency of the bail. 7. In case of any breach of the aforementioned condition, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 8. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of these instant bail applications and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. 9. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court and Jail authorities through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J HEENA/50