[2026:RJ-JP:26222] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8149/2026 URN: CRLMB / 14905U / 2026 Tejpal Kharesiya @ Teja S/o Shri Ramkaran, Age About 26 Years, R/o Kharesiyo Ki Dhani, Tan Dukiya, Police Station Khatushyamji Sadar, District Sikar (Raj.). (At Present In District Jail Sikar). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Babu Lal Nasuna For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP Mr. Onkar Singh Rajpurohit, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA Order 13/07/2026 1. This instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the accused-petitioner against the order passed by learned trial Court dated 13.05.2026 under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 11/2026 registered at Police Station Khatushyamji Sadar, District Sikar for the offence(s) under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 119(1), 351(3) & 3(5) of BNS, in which charge-sheet has been submitted 126(2), 115(2), 119(1), 351(3), 3(5) & 308(3) of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that accused-petitioner is behind the bars since long; that charge-sheet has been filed. He also submits that accused- petitioner is not named in the FIR; that complainant PW-1 Karan Singh Shekhawat has already been examined and during trial, he [2026:RJ-JP:26222] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-8149/2026] said nothing incriminating against the accused-petitioner. He further submits that co-accused persons have already been enlarged on bail; conclusion of trial may take considerable time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused- petitioner behind the bars and, therefore, prays that the accused- petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor have vehemently opposed the contentions put forth by the learned counsel for the accused-petitioner and submits that there are twelve criminal antecedents registered against the accused-petitioner. 4. Heard and persused the material available on record; considering the facts and circumstances of the case and rival contentions advanced by the learned counsel for both the parties; particularly keeping in view the fact that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 13.02.2026; that accused-petitioner is not named in the FIR; that charge-sheet has already been filed; that complainant has already been examined and during trial, nothing incriminating has been stated against the accused-petitioner; that the co-accused persons Sitaram and Sayar Singh have already been enlarged on bail by the trial Court itself and by this Court respectively; that trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 5. Therefore, this instant bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Tejpal Kharesiya @ Teja S/o Shri Ramkaran is ordered to be released [2026:RJ-JP:26222] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-8149/2026] on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve himself in any offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence on 15th of every month in the concerned police station till the completion of trial of this case. 7. In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 8. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. 9. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J 31/SHIVANI