Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10128 (ORI)

SURYANARAYAN PANIGRAHI v. STATE OF ODISHA

ABLAPL/143/2026 · 2026-01-09

V Narasingh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ABLAPL No.143 of 2026 Suryanarayan Panigrahi …. Petitioner Mr. R. N. Prusty, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha …. Opposite Party Mr. M. K. Mohanty, ASC CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH Order No. ORDER 09.01.2026 01. 1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 2. The Petitioner is seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with G.R. Case No.389 of 2025 pending on the file of learned JMFC, Begunia, arising out of Begunia P.S. Case No.398 of 2025 for commission of offences punishable under Sections 305(e), and 3(5) of BNS, 2023 read with Section 51 of Odisha Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 2016. 3. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for pre-arrest bail. 4. Taking into account the nature of allegations and the punishment prescribed, this Court directs that on surrendering within three weeks hence and p. 2 moving for bail, the Petitioner shall be released on bail by the learned Court in seisin on such terms as deemed just and proper subject to verification of criminal antecedent of similar nature. 5. If it comes to the fore that the Petitioner has any such criminal antecedent, this order shall not be given effect to. 6. It is needless to state that the Petitioner shall cooperate with the ongoing investigation. 7. Accordingly, the ABLAPL stands disposed of. (V. NARASINGH) Judge Jina