IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT M/s Jain Marble & Granites State of Haryana CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Present : Mr. Pranav Jain, Advocate (through video conferencing) Mr. Hrithik Chaudhary, Advocate Mr. Nikhil Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Sourabh Goel, DEEPAK SIBAL 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the which was the subject matter of the petition stands amicably settled rendering the present petition 2. Disposed of. April 21, 2026 vandana Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable Sr. No.254 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-33184 Date of Decision : M/s Jain Marble & Granites Versus State of Haryana and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Mr. Pranav Jain, Advocate (through video conferencing) Mr. Hrithik Chaudhary, Advocate Mr. Nikhil Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Sourabh Goel, Additional A.G., Haryana. *** DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the which was the subject matter of the petition stands amicably settled the present petition infructuous. Disposed of. (DEEPAK SIBAL JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE , 2026 ther speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 33184-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision : 21.04.2026 …Petitioner …Respondents DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Mr. Pranav Jain, Advocate (through video conferencing) Mr. Hrithik Chaudhary, Advocate for Additional A.G., Haryana. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the dispute which was the subject matter of the petition stands amicably settled DEEPAK SIBAL) JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE VANDANA 2026.04.23 09:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document