Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10124 (AP)

S SAHADEVA REDDY v. PEYUSH KUMAR

CC/445/2026 · 2026-09-10

Harinath N

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 HN, J C.C.No.445_2026 APHC010006862026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY, THE 11th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 445/2026 Between: 1. S SAHADEVA REDDY, S/O. S KONDA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, OCC. CONTRACTOR CLASS-H, RESIDENT OF D.NO.1/436- 7/2, MARUTI NAGAR, KADAPA, Y.S.R DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. PEYUSH KUMAR, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SRI N MANOJ REDDY, COMMISSIONER, KADAPA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, KADAPA, Y.S.R DISTRICT. 3. SRI P BHAVANI PRASAD, COMMISSIONER, KADAPA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, KADAPA, Y.S.R DISTRICT, 516001, (PRESENTLY WORKING AS COMMISSIONER) R 3 IS IMPLEADED AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 17.07.2026, VIDE IA NO-1/2026 IN CC NO- 445 OF 2026. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the Respondents herein for violation of the orders, dated 09.10.2025 made in W.P.No.27777of 2025 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 2 HN, J C.C.No.445_2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased May be pleased to permit me to bring the proposed respondent No.3 as respondent No.3 in the con tempt case and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PAPUDIPPU SASHIDAR REDDY Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. NAGARAJU PULLAGURA 2. M DELHI BABU 3 HN, J C.C.No.445_2026 ORDER: 1. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the orders of this Court have been duly complied with by the respondents. 2. In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, nothing would further survive for consideration in this contempt case. 3. Recording the same, the present contempt case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:11.09.2026 NKA 4 HN, J C.C.No.445_2026 115 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 445 of 2026 Date: 11.09.2026 NKA