APHC010222122019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] THURSDAY, THE 17th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 814/2019 Between: 1. LINGINENI SRINIVASA RAO, S/O. RANGA RAO, R/O. LEMALLE VILLAGE, AMARAVATHI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. LINGINENI RANGA RAO, S/O. VENKATESWARA RAO, R/O. LEMALLE VILLAGE, AMARAVATHI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. LINGINENI SAMBRAJYAM, W/O. RANGA RAO, R/O. LEMALLE VILLAGE, AMARAVATHI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. LINGINENI SUJATHA RAO, D/O RANGA RAO, R/O. LEMALLE VILLAGE, AMARAVATHI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. LINGINENI SUNEETHA, W/O. SRINIVASA RAO, R/O. D.NO 30-20- 40/3, 1ST LINE PATTABIPURAM, GUNTUR DISTRICT.A.P., 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. KODURU BUJJI BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. VIVEKANANDA VIRUPAKSHA 2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) 2 The Court made the following: ORDER: Heard the learned Counsel for the Petitioners and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor. 2. Petitioners and Respondent No.1 are present. 3. Pursuant to the directions given by the learned XII Additional Sessions Judge, Guntur, in the judgment dated 17.01.2019 rendered in Crl.A.No.565 of 2016, the learned Trial Court revisited the matter, proceeded with the trial in accordance with law, and, upon a comprehensive appreciation of the oral and documentary evidence available on record, ultimately recorded a finding of acquittal in favour of the Petitioners. 4. A perusal of the information available on the e-Courts portal reveals that the Petitioners have been acquitted of the charges levelled against them for the offences punishable under Section 498-A of ‘the I.P.C.,’ and Sections 3 and 4 of ‘the D.P.Act.’ 5. In view of the subsequent developments culminating in the acquittal of the Petitioners by the learned Trial Court, the cause of action that initially necessitated adjudication of the present Criminal Revision Case no longer survives for consideration. Consequently, as nothing further remains to be adjudicated in the revision proceedings, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as having become infructuous, leaving it open to the parties to work out their remedies, if any, in accordance with law. No order as to costs. 3 As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Dt: 17.09.2026 VTS