Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10121 (AP)

MARTURI VENKATA RAO v. SRI K KANNA BABU

CC/3008/2024 · 2026-09-10

Sumathi Jagadam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010307452024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] FRIDAY, THE 11th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3008/2024 Between: 1. MARTURI VENKATA RAO, S/O. VENKATESWARLU, AGE 57 YEARS, R/O.KAKUTURIVARIPLAEM VILLAGE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI K KANNA BABU, THE COMMISSIONER, PANCHYAT RAJ DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI. 2. SRI DHINESH KUMAR, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 3. SRI SUBRAMANAYAM, THE MANDAL PARISHAD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, TANGUTUR, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 4. S K JOHAN BASHA, THE KAKUTURIVARIPALEM GRAM PANCHAYATH REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, KAKUTURIVARIPALEM VILLAGE, TANGUTURU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to take into cognizance the offence of contempt of court committed by the respondent herein and to prosecute hem for violating the orders dated 13.6.2024 passed in W.P. No. 12262 of 2024 by the Honble Smt.JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM and pass such 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MARELLA RADHA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. SOMA RAJU YELISETTI 2. Mattegunta.Sudhir,Standing Counsel For Z.P.Ps,M.P.Ps,Gram Panchayats 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: This contempt case is filed against the respondents for wilful disobedience of the orders dated 13.06.2024 passed by this Court in W.P.No.12262 of 2024. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner requested to close the contempt case with a liberty to file a fresh writ petition. Recording the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the contempt case is closed, with a liberty to the petitioner to work out his remedies, if any further cause of action arouse. No costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 11.09.2026 rsd 4 10 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3008/2024 Date: 11.09.2026 rsd