Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10118 (MAD)

M.MUNIVARADHAN v. Tamil Nadu Urban Habitat

WP/12726/2026 · 2026-04-06

M Dhandapani

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 12726 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 06-04-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI WP No. 12726 of 2026 and WMP.Nos.13922 & 13920 of 2026 1. M.Munivaradhan 2. Saraswathi shanmugam 3. Banupriya sakthivel 4. Chithravalli 5. Dhanalakshmi 6. Parthiban anbazhagan 7. P. Arumugam 8. Aravalli 9. Jothi surendran 10. Gowrishwari murugan 11. S. Monika 12. Kalaimani kathavarayan 13. R. Mangalakshmi 14. K. Susila 15. A. Kartheepan 16. Mari durairaj 17. K. Sanjai kumar 18. M. Prem kumar 19. Chandru 20. Logesh 21. M. Karthick 22. Gandhimathi 23. Mamuthabee 24. Hemavathi 25. K. Sivalakshmi 26. S. Lavanya 27. Narayanan 28. Susila ragavaan 29. V. Geetha 30. R. Monitha 31. C. Prathap 32. Adhilakshmi arumugam 33. Prasanth 34. Govindhammal rajamanickam 35. Thayalan https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 12726 of 2026 36. Kushpu dharani 37. S. Kavitha 38. Sarala 39. Sakunthala veerappan 40. S. Sudhapriya 41. Valli 42. A. Yasar ali 43. Vijay 44. U. Ponmozhi 45. Anjali 46. Nagamalli 47. Desarani 48. Kalaivani manickam 49. Kathiravan 50. Kuppu pitchai 51. S. Sangeetha 52. Deepak kalyanakumar 53. Valli 54. Usha sudhakar 55. Nandhini 56. G. Hasini 57. M. Samynathan 58. Divya mahalakshmi 59. A. Reka 60. Sampath 61. Vikranth 62. Dharani 63. R. Veerath 64. S. Indrani 65. Malathy jayachandran 66. J. Satish kumar 67. Sandhi 68. Prema 69. S. Dhanavalli 70. Valli 71. Sivagami 72. Kaviya 73. Rajan 74. Kuppu 75. Devi 76. Yamuneswari loganathan 77. Parthiban 78. A. Abdulrahman https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 12726 of 2026 79. K. Satheeshkumar 80. Punitha 81. Jagadeesan 82. M. Tamilarasan 83. Suba devi Petitioner(s) Vs 1. Tamil Nadu Urban Habitat Development Board (TNUHDB) Kamarajar Salai, Ayothiya Nagar, Triplicane Chennai - 600 005. 2.The District Collector 62, Rajaji Salai,Chennai Collectorate, Singaravelar Maaligai Chennai - 600 001. Respondent(s) PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, directing the respondents to allot residential accommodation to the petitioners in accordance with the Allotment Order dated 17.03.2017, 27.03.2017, 25.04.2017 and 26.05.2017 in Proceedings No. G1/11930/2011 issued by the 1st respondent or otherwise, reallot residential accommodation to the petitioners in the remaining unutilized land available after the expansion of the Ennore Expressway in the Nalla Thaneer Odai Kuppam area For Petitioner(s): Mr.V.Balasubramani For Respondent: Ms.Indumathi Venkatesan for R1 Mr.A.Selvendran for R2 Special Government Pleader ORDER WMP.No.13920 of 2026 has been filed to permit the petitioners to file a single writ petition. This petition is ordered on payment of separate court fee. 2. By consent of both parties, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself. 3. This writ petition has been filed for a direction, directing the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 12726 of 2026 respondents to allot residential accommodation to the petitioners in accordance with the Allotment Order dated 17.03.2017, 27.03.2017, 25.04.2017 and 26.05.2017 in Proceedings No. G1/11930/2011 issued by the 1st respondent or otherwise, reallot residential accommodation to the petitioners in the remaining unutilized land available after the expansion of the Ennore Expressway in the Nalla Thaneer Odai Kuppam area. 4. It is the case of the petitioners that the petitioners are all fishermen families of the Nalla Thanneer Odai Kuppam have been living for the past three generations. In the year 2017, for the expansion of road, they were directed to vacate the places and the Government has decided to construct new four- storeyed buildings and relocate the families and in this regard, the first respondent has given alloltment order vide order dated 17.03.2017, however, it is the grievance of the petitioners that no alternative accommodation were arranged and provided as per the allotment issued by the first respondent and the petitioners are living in a rented houses. In this regard, they have submitted representations on 16.02.2026 and 17.02.2026 to the respondents and they are also pending without consideration till date. Hence, this writ petition. 5. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that this Court may issue a direction to the first respondent to consider the representations of the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 12726 of 2026 petitioners dated 16.02.2026 and 17.02.2026 within a reasonable time as fixed by this Court. 6. Heard both sides and perused the materials placed on record. 7. Considering the limited relief sought for in this writ petition, this Court without going into the merits of the case directs the first respondent to consider the representations of the petitioners dated 16.02.2026 and 17.02.2026 and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order. 8. Accordingly, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition stands closed. 06-04-2026 dhk Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 12726 of 2026 To 1.Tamil Nadu Urban Habitat Development Board (TNUHDB) Kamarajar Salai, Ayothiya Nagar, Triplicane Chennai - 600 005. 2.The District Collector 62, Rajaji Salai,Chennai Collectorate, Singaravelar Maaligai Chennai - 600 001. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 12726 of 2026 M.DHANDAPANI J. dhk WP No. 12726 of 2026 06-04-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis