APHC010306222009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY, THE 10th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1987 OF 2009 Between: 1. M/S. I.K.F.FINANCE LTD., rep. by its Director, Ch. V.Rama Rao, S/o Rosaiah, Vijayawada, Power of Attorney Holder of HDFC Bank Ltd., Registered office at Bank House, Senapathi Bapat Marg, Lower Parel, Mumbai-400 013 and having branch, ...Petitioner AND 1. THE STATE OF A P ANOTHER, rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., at Hyderabad. 2. Ashfaa, S/o Rajvvan Sab, R/o H.No.585/7, 3rd Cross, Narasarajpet, Behind Mudagowdru Primary School, Devanagar - 577 001. ...Respondents Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to submit this Memorandum of Crl.R.C., aggrieved by the order in C.F.No.10000 of 2009, dt.23-10-2009 on the file of the Court of the I Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Vijayawada, Krishna District. IA NO: 1 OF 2009(CRLRCMP 2777 OF 2009 2 SS, J Crl.R.C.No.1987 of 2009 Dated 10.09.2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to expedite the hearing of the Crl.R.C., pending disposal of the Crl.R.C. Counsel for the Petitioner: V R AVULA Counsel for the Respondents: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following Order: 3 SS, J Crl.R.C.No.1987 of 2009 Dated 10.09.2026 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1987 OF 2009 The Court made the following Order: The memo filed on behalf of the petitioner is taken on record. 2. The memo contends a letter from the petitioner, wherein, the petitioner intends to withdraw the revision case. 3. The instant Criminal Revision Case has been preferred against order dated 23-10-2009 passed in C.F.No.10000 of 2009 by learned I Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Vijayawada, Krishna District, where under, the complaint filed by the petitioner against the accused under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, was returned for want of jurisdiction. 4. It appears from the memo that the matter has been settled out of the Court and for which the petitioner intends to withdraw the instant Criminal Revision Case. 5. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 6. Perused the written memo and the instructions of the petitioner. 7. Considering the same, the instant Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as withdrawn. 4 SS, J Crl.R.C.No.1987 of 2009 Dated 10.09.2026 As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________________ JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA Dated: 10-09-2026 MSI 5 SS, J Crl.R.C.No.1987 of 2009 Dated 10.09.2026 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1987 OF 2009 Dated: 10-09-2026 MSI