SMT. SUNITA CHAUDHARY v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
CRLR/2672/2017 · 2026-09-29
Jai Krishna Upadhyay
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10116 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10116 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 2672 of 2017 Court No. - 85 HON'BLE JAI KRISHNA UPADHYAY, J.
1. The certified copy of the orders dated 16.08.2023 and 28.01.2025 are taken on record.
2. List revised. No one is present on behalf of the revisionist to press this revision. However, Mr. Madan Singh, learned counsel for the opposite party nos. 2 and 3 and learned AGA for the State are present.
3. This Criminal Revision has been preferred against the judgment and order dated 15.05.2017 passed by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 4, Aligarh in Complaint Case No. 890 of 2016 (Sunita Vs. Surendra Kumar Verma and another) under Section 417 IPC, Police Station- Qarshi, District- Aligarh, whereby the learned Magistrate has summoned the opposite party nos. 2 and 3 under Section 417 IPC.
4. Learned counsel for opposite party nos. 2 and 3 submits that opposite party nos. 2 and 3 were lastly discharged by the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Court No. 14, Aligarh, on 28.01.2025, therefore, this revision has become infructuous.
5. Accordingly, the present revision is dismissed as infructuous. September 30, 2026 Nisha Versus Counsel for Revisionist(s) : R.K Singh Gaharwar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Madan Singh (Jai Krishna Upadhyay,J.) Smt. Sunita Chaudhary .....Revisionist(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- nisha kumari High Court of Judicature at Allahabad