T.V.Gopi v. The State rep by the Inspector of Police
CRL OP/9404/2026 · 2026-04-16
C Kumarappan
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10109 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10109 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRL OP No. 9404 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 16-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CRL OP No. 9404 of 2026 T.V.Gopi ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State rep by The Sub Inspector of Police Thiruthani Police Station, Thiruvallur District. (Crime No.160 of 2026) ..Respondent(s) Prayer:- Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of BNSS, pleased to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in connection with in Crime No.160 of 2026 on the file of respondent Police and thus render justice. For Petitioner(s): M/s. V. Manimaran For Respondent(s): Mr.P.Dhileepan Government Advocate (Criminal Side) ORDER The petitioner apprehends arrest for the alleged offence under Section 303 (2), 326 of BNS Act, r/w 21 (1) Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, in Crime No.160 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner had illegally transported 8 units of gravel sand in a lorry. Hence, the case. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 9404 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 2 C.KUMARAPPAN, J. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that he is ready to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court and that he is ready to cooperate with the investigation. Hence, he prayed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 4.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent Police reiterated the prosecution case and further submitted that petitioner has two previous cases and has been regularly doing similar nature of offences. Hence, he opposed the grant of anticipatory bail. 5.From the submissions made by the learned Government Advocate (Criminal side), it is pellucid that the petitioner has misused the liberty which had been granted by this Court in earlier point of time. Hence, this is not a fit case to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, this Criminal Original petition is dismissed. 16-04-2026 ep To 1.The Sub Inspector of Police Thiruthani Police Station, Thiruvallur District. 2.The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras.
CRL OP No. 9404 of 2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis