APHC010413512025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] FRIDAY, THE 11th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2188/2025 Between: 1. M/S.MRGR CONSTRUCTIONS, REP.BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER SRI M.RAMAGOVINDA REDDY S/O.M.PITCHI REDDY, AGED 62 YEARS FLAT NO.402, VENKATADRIAPARTMENT GANDHI NAGAR, KADAPA - 516 001 ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI SAI PRASAD, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH FINANCE DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. SRI P SREE RAMA CHANDRA REDDY, CHIEF ENGINEER (PROJECTS) DISTRICT WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT MAMILLAPALLE, KADAPA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH 4. SRI B VENKATARAMAIAH, SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER NTR TGP CIRCLE, KADAPA - 516 004 YSR KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 5. SRI E MALLIKARJUNA, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER NTR TGP DIVISION, PORUMAMILLA YSR KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA 2 PRADESH 6. SRI B SRINIVAS, PAY AND ACCOUNTS OFFICER KADAPA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents under Sec.10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act for wilfully and deliberately disobeying the orders dt.27-03-2025 passed in W.P.No. 15350/2024 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. D KODANDARAMI REDDY Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. SOMA RAJU YELISETTI 2. T LAKSHMI PADMAJA 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: This contempt case is filed against the respondents for wilful disobedience of the orders dated 27.03.2025 passed by this Court in W.P.No.15350 of 2024. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents have complied with the orders passed by this Court and no further orders are required to be passed in the contempt case. Recording the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the contempt case is closed, accordingly. No costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 11.09.2026 rsd 4 7 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2188/2025 Date: 11.09.2026 rsd