Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10105 (HP)

ANIL KUMAR AND ANOTHER v. ABHISHEK JAIN AND OTHERS

COPC/288/2026 · 2026-05-26

Sushil Kukreja

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Contempt Petition No.288 of 2026 Date of decision: 26.05.2026 Anil Kumar & anr. ….Petitioners Versus Dr. Abhishek Jain & Ors. ….Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, J. Whether approved for reporting ?1 For the Petitioners: Mr. Bhupinder Kumar, Advocate vice Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Ankush Thakur, Deputy Advocate General. Sushil Kukreja, Judge(Oral): Learned Deputy Advocate General, has placed on record office order dated 25.05.2026, wherein, it has been stated that the Principal of concerned school where the petitioners are presently working is hereby directed to fix the pay of the petitioners for the period they served on contract basis (TGTs) at the (60%) minimum of revised pay scale + Grade Pay (60%) alongwith such hike to which they are entitled to, in terms of revised notification from 01.01.2016 to till their regularization subject to final outcome of LPA being filed by State and other legal remedies. However, an undertaking to this 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2 effect may be obtained from the petitioners that the overpayment if any, found, in late stage, shall be recovered from them accordingly. 2. Therefore, in view of the above, as the judgment under reference has been duly complied with, no further order is required to be passed in the present contempt petition and accordingly, the same is closed and disposed of. However, the petitioners are at liberty to assail the aforesaid consideration order dated 25.05.2026, if they still remain aggrieved. ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge May 26, 2026 (reena)