902ba1389-26 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 902 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1389 OF 2026 Firoz Raju Shaikh VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra ... Mr. Jadhav Satej S, Advocate for the Applicant Mr. S. A. Gaikwad, APP for the Respondent-State CORAM : HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J. Dated : 11th September, 2026 PER COURT :- 1. After hearing the learned Advocate for the Applicant, when this Court has expressed its disinclination to allow the application, the learned Advocate for the applicant, upon instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the present Application. Permission to withdraw the application is granted. The learned APP, on instructions from his counter part, submits that the trial is likely to be concluded within a period of one year. 2. The Bail application stands disposed of as withdrawn. (HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J.) JPChavan 1 of 1 2026:BHC-AUG:42515