URMILA DEVI W/O SHRI POONAMARAM VISHNOI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/9107/2026 · 2026-07-06
Bipin Gupta
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10101 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10101 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:25149] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9107/2026 URN: CRLMB / 16672U / 2026 Urmila Devi W/o Shri Poonamaram Vishnoi, Aged About 31 Years, R/o 419, Madhubaniya Ki Dhani, Vadanaya, Police Station Bagoda, District Sanchore, Rajasthan. (Presently Confined In Central Jail, Ajmer) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Akshay Sharma Mr. Charu Mathur through VC Mr. Sparsh Bansal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, AGA, Mr. Shayam Sunder Vishnoi, Addl. SP SOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA
Judgment / Order 06/07/2026
1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS, 2023 against the order dated 05.05.2026 passed by learned Additional District and Session Judge No.1, Ajmer, in Crim- inal Misc. Case No.522/2026, whereby the bail application of the petitioner was rejected in connection with F.I.R. No.101/2024, Po- lice Station Civil Lines, Ajmer, for the offences under Sections 419, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 and 120B IPC and under Section 3/10 Rajasthan Public Examination Act 2022.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that except the offence under Section 3/10 of The Rajasthan Public Examination (Measures for Prevention of Unfair Means in Recruitment) act,
[2026:RJ-JP:25149] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-9107/2026] 2022 all other offences are trial by Magistrate. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the only allegation against the petitioner is that she had appeared as dummy Candidate for Kamla in the examination in which the forged degree has been given, Kamla has already been enlarged on bail. Therefore benefit bail may be granted to Urmila.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the conclusion of investigation/trial will take sufficiently long time and even the offences are triable by a Magistrate. He, therefore, prays that the petitioner may also be enlarged on bail, particularly in view of the fact that she has been in judicial custody since
04.05.2026.
4. Learned Additional Government Advocate vehemently opposes the bail application.
5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Government Advocate and perused the material available on record.
6. Without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case and upon a consideration of the arguments advanced that there are not antecedents of committing any of any offerces of similar nature or any other nature, the offences are triable by Magistrate except Section 3/10 of the Rajasthan Public Examination, Act, 2022 and the investigation/trial will take considerable amount of time. Therefore, this Court is of the opinion that the bail application filed by the petitioner deserves to be accepted.
7. Consequently, the bail application is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner - Urmila Devi W/o Shri
[2026:RJ-JP:25149] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-9107/2026] Poonamaram Vishnoi arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.101/2024, Police Station Civil Lines, Ajmer, shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/ (Rs. One Lakh Only) with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- (Rs. Fifty Thousand Only) each, to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so till the completion of the trial and with additional following conditions: (i) The petitioner shall not leave country without the permission of the Court; (ii) The petitioner shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected; and (iii) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from dis- closing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
(BIPIN GUPTA),J 109/JUBIN