[2026:RJ-JP:25137] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No. 10003/2026 URN: CRLMB / 18571U / 2026 Vishnu S/o Ramveer, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Chulhera Police Station Khoh, District Deeg (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through its Public Prosecutor ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No. 10004/2026 URN: CRLMB / 18572U / 2026 Yusuf S/o Ibrahim, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Kakrala Police Station Sikari, District Deeg (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through its Public Prosecutor ----Respondent S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No. 10154/2026 URN: CRLMB / 18847U / 2026 Hasam @ Hasamdeen S/o Subedeen, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Nangal, Police Station Kaithwara, District Deeg. (Presently Confined At District Jail Deeg). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sanjay Khan Mr. Deepesh Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, P.P. HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA Order [2026:RJ-JP:25137] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-10003/2026] 06/07/2026 1. These instant 2nd bail applications have been filed on behalf of the accused-petitioners under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 38/2026 registered at Police Station Kaithwara, District Deeg for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61(2)(a) of BNS and under Section 66D of IT Act. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case; that charge-sheet has already been filed; that the accused-petitioners are in custody since long; that the alleged offences are triable by Magistrate and conclusion of trial will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused- petitioners behind the bars and, therefore, prays that the accused- petitioners may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused- petitioners hereinabove. It is further submitted that one criminal antecedent is registered against the accused-petitioner Hasam @ Hasamdeen. 4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for both the parties; that the charge-sheet against the accused-petitioners has already been filed; that the accused- petitioners are in custody since 25.03.2026; that the trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on [2026:RJ-JP:25137] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-10003/2026] the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. 5. Therefore, these instant 2nd bail applications under Section 483 BNSS are accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioners namely Vishnu S/o Ramveer, Yusuf S/o Ibrahim and Hasam @ Hasamdeen S/o Subedeen are ordered to be released on bail, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioners shall not involve themselves in any offence(s) during currency of the bail. 7. In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioners for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 8. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail applications and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. 9. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J 121-123/KAVISH