Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10098 (KAR)

M/S SREE KRISHNA DEVELOPER AND PROMOTERS v. MONICKAVASAGOM PILLAI

WP/5691/2026 · 2026-03-17

Sachin Shankar Magadum

Public Interest Litigationbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:15570 WP No. 5691 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM WRIT PETITION NO. 5691 OF 2026 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: M/S. SREE KRISHNA DEVELOPER AND PROMOTERS REP. BY ITS PROPRETOR GOPINATH L 189, 3RD FLOOR, 1ST MAIN, WEST OF CHORD ROAD, MAHALAKSHMI LAYOUT, BENGALURU URBAN - 560 086. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. PRASHANTH M.V, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. MONICKAVASAGOM PILLAI S/O KUMARASWAMI PILLAI F-102, VASUNDHRA RESIDENCY, 9TH CROSS, BYRASANDRA MAIN ROAD, G.M. PALAYA, BANGALORE - 560 075. 2. STATE EXCISE MULTIPURPOSE COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD., 2721, 14TH MAIN, ATTIGUPPE, Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:15570 WP No. 5691 of 2026 VIJAYANAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 040, REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT-T.RAMESH. 3. THE KARNATAKA REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY, 2ND FLOOR, SILVER JUBILEE BLOCK, UNITY BUILDING, CSI COMPOUND 3RD CROSS, MISSION ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 027, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY. …RESPONDENTS THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO 1. CALL FOR RECORDS IN CMP NO. CMP/UR/220826/00099 41, VIDE- ANNEXURE A ON THE FILE OF KARNATAKA REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY. 2. AND SET-ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 03.05.2024, PASSED IN CMP NO.CMP/UR/220826/00099 41, VIDE ANNEXURE-A, BY KARNATAKA REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:15570 WP No. 5691 of 2026 ORAL ORDER A complaint filed under Section 31 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, (for short, 'RERA Act') against the petitioner is now sought to be challenged by filing a petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner has an efficacious remedy under the provisions of the RERA Act, 2016 and therefore this Court is not inclined to examine the disputed question of facts. Since the petitioner has an efficacious remedy by way of an appeal, the writ petition stands dismissed with liberty to approach the appellate court. Sd/- (SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM) JUDGE HDK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 20