HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 39847 of 2026 Court No. - 36 HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Information sought by the petitioner has been provided which is specifically mentioned in the impugned order dated 27.7.2026 passed in the Second Appeal filed by the petitioner under the provisions of Right to Information Act. 3. The complaint made by the applicant against the contesting respondent about her appointment on forged documents were found false upon an inquiry and that she has now retired also, even petitioner has not come up forward to record his statement. 4. If petitioner has any grievance with the inquiry or otherwise, the appropriate forum is not to file an application under Right to Information Act, 2005 since under said Act only information is to provide not to take any action on complaint. 5. In aforesaid circumstances, no case of interference is made out, hence Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed. October 1, 2026 SB Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anjali, Pramod Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.) Avanish Kumar Rai .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SANDEEP BHATTACHARYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad