Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10089 (JHR)

VIKASH KUMAR PASWAN ALIAS VIKASH KUMAR ALIAS VIKASH PASWAN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./2686/2026 · 2026-04-28

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:12474] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.2686 of 2026 ------ Vikash Kumar Paswan @ Vikash Kumar @ Vikash Paswan, aged about 27 years, son of Birendra Paswan, resident of Village Sugi, P.O and P.S. Tarhasi, District Palamau (Jharkhand) .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Satish Prasad, Addl.P.P. ------ Order No:-03 Dated:-28-04-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Tarhasi P.S. Case No. 14 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 305(a), 331(4) of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner committed theft in the house of the informant. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been implicated in this case only because the looted amount has been recovered from the house of the petitioner. It is also submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 27.01.2026 as is evident from para-01 of the instant bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-11 of the instant bail application. It is next submitted that the co-accused, with similar allegations, has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 18.04.2026 passed in B.A. No. 3179 of 2026. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Palamau in connection with Tarhasi P.S. Case No. 14 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 28.04.2026 Saroj/