Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10088 (KAR)

THE PRINCIPAL v. THE COMMISSIONER

WP/3448/2026 · 2026-04-01

Sachin Shankar Magadum

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:17857 WP No. 3448 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM WRIT PETITION NO. 3448 OF 2026 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. THE PRINCIPAL THE RURAL DEGREE COLLAGE KANAKAPURA, KANAKAPURA TOWN, KANAKAPURA TALUK, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK, PIN-561117 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. HARSHA G S.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE COMMISSIONER KARNATAKA STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION (SECOND APPELLATE AUTHORITY) ROOM NO. 104, 1ST FLOOR, MAHITHI SOWDHA D. DEVARAJ ARASU ROAD, BENGALURU 560001. 2. INFORMATION OFFICER AND THE JOINT DIRECTOR, (FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY) OFFICE OF REGIONAL JOINT DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF COLLAGE EDUCATION, GANDHI NAGAR, BENGALURU-560009. Digitally signed by CHAITHRA A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:17857 WP No. 3448 of 2026 3. SRI. KUMAR K.S S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED ABOUT- MAJOR R/AT ARKESWARA NILAYA 2ND FLOOR, ARCHAKARAHALLI, RAMANAGARA, BENGALURU SOUTH DISTRICT.562159 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT NAVYA SHEKHAR AGA FOR R1 AND R2) THIS WP UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA IS FILED PRAYING TO-QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDERS DATED 07.04.2025 PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT IN CASE BEARING PRAKABEM/AAAVI-NO. KAASHIE/ 1/94 MELMANAVI/ 2024-25 VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND ORDER DATED 14/11/2025, PASSED BY THE 1 RESPONDENT IN CASE BEARING NO. KAMAAAAA 7787 APL 2025 VIDE ANNEXURE-B IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:17857 WP No. 3448 of 2026 ORAL ORDER Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 01.04.2026, seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. 2. The memo is taken on record. 3. In view of the said memo, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, reserving liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh writ petition. Sd/- (SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM) JUDGE AMM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 51