Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10087 (KAR)

MRS HAJIRA @ HAZRA v. MR CHETHAN KUMAR

MFA/6975/2018 · 2026-03-14

Lok Adalath

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK-ADALAT IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 CONCILIATORS PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T. AND SRI NAMAN VANKDARI M, MEMBER MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.6975 OF 2018 (MV-D) (LOK-ADALAT NO.1083 OF 2026) BETWEEN: 1. MRS. HAJIRA @ HAZRA W/O LATE SAMEER, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, 2. MASTER RAMEEZA, S/O LATE SAMEER, AGED ABOUT 5 YEARS, APPELLANT NO.2 IS MINOR HENCE REPRESENTED BY HIS NEXT FRIEND NATURAL GUARDIAN AND MOTHER APPELLANT NO.1- MRS. HAJIRA @ HAZAR BOTH ARE RESIDING AT 11-52, GOODINABAIL HOUSE, NEAR MASJID A MUTTHALIB, B MOODA, JODUMARGA, BANTWAL TALUK, D.K.DISTRICT. ...APPELLANTS (BY SRI.RAVISHANKAR SHASTRY G, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. MR.CHETHAN KUMAR, S/O. RAMANATHA POOJARY, ADULT, R/AT NO.1-26, GOMAI HOUSE, KANEMAR, THUMBE POST, BANTWAL TALUK, D.K. DISTRICT - 574 219. Digitally signed by DEEPU M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA 2 2. ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., 414, VEER SAVARKAR MARG, NEAR SIDDIVINAYAKA TEMPLE, PRABHADEVI, MUMBAI - 400 025. REPRESENTED BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER, ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., MAXIMUS COMMERCIAL COMPLEX, LIGHT HOUSE HILL ROAD, MANGALORE, D.K.DISTRICT - 575 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI B. PRADEEP, ADVOCATE FOR R2; R1 SERVED) * * * THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF THE MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 06.04.2018 PASSED IN M.V.C. NO.1572/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE AND II ADDITIONAL MACT, MANGALURU, D.K., PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK-ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED: CONCILIATION ORDER Learned counsel appearing for the appellants-claimants and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent-Insurance Company along with its representative are present. 2. After prolonged negotiations, the matter is settled. A joint memo signed by the learned counsel appearing for the appellants- claimants and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent- Insurance Company and its Authorised Officer is filed. The appellants- claimants have agreed to receive and the respondent-Insurance Company has agreed to pay a lump-sum of Rs.8,50,000/- (Rupees 3 eight lakhs fifty thousand only), in addition to what has been awarded by the Tribunal, in full and final settlement of the claim. 3. The respondent-Insurance Company has agreed to deposit the said amount before the Tribunal within a period of six weeks' from the date of preparation of award, failing which, the said amount shall carry interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of default, till the date of deposit. 4. The apportionment, deposit and release of the enhanced compensation amount shall be made in terms of the judgment and award passed by the Tribunal. 5. This miscellaneous first appeal stands disposed off in terms of the joint memo. The judgment and award of the Tribunal shall stand modified accordingly. Draw up the award accordingly. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER AM