RFA-168 119 (8) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA State of Punjab and anr. Dharam Singh (Deceased) through LRs. CORAM: Present: HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) CM-393- Singh is allowed, as prayed for, subject to all just exceptions. The applicants mentioned in brought on record as legal representatives of Singh, to pursue the present appeal. Amended memo of parties is taken on record. MAIN CASE Punjab and another Vs. Hardev Singh and others order of even date. 15.01.2026 sanjay 1682-2005 (O&M) [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***** RFA XOBJR 70 Date of Decision: 15.01.2026 State of Punjab and anr. Versus Dharam Singh (Deceased) through LRs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Present: Mr.Gunjan Mehta, Addl.A.G., Punjab for the appellants. Mr. V.K. Kataria, Advocate Mr. Mayank Vashishth, Advocate for Mr. Prateek Mahajan, Advocate for the XOBJRs/ landowners. -.- HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) -CI-2025 Application for impleading LRs of is allowed, as prayed for, subject to all just exceptions. The applicants mentioned in para 3 of the application are ordered to be brought on record as legal representatives of , to pursue the present appeal. Amended memo of parties is taken on record. Registry to tag the same at appropriate place. MAIN CASE For orders, see RFA No. Punjab and another Vs. Hardev Singh and others order of even date. 15.01.2026 Whether speaking/reasoned? Whether Reportable? ] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RFA-1682-2005 (O&M) and XOBJR 70-CI-2005 (O&M) Date of Decision: 15.01.2026 …….Appellants Versus Dharam Singh (Deceased) through LRs. ..….Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Mr.Gunjan Mehta, Addl.A.G., Punjab for the appellants. Mr. V.K. Kataria, Advocate Mr. Mayank Vashishth, Advocate for Mr. Prateek Mahajan, Advocate for the XOBJRs/ landowners. Application for impleading LRs of respondent Dharam is allowed, as prayed for, subject to all just exceptions. The the application are ordered to be brought on record as legal representatives of respondent Dharam , to pursue the present appeal. Amended memo of parties is Registry to tag the same at appropriate place. RFA No.1674-2005, titled as State of Punjab and another Vs. Hardev Singh and others, decided vide (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No Yes/No Mr.Gunjan Mehta, Addl.A.G., Punjab for the appellants. respondent Dharam is allowed, as prayed for, subject to all just exceptions. The the application are ordered to be respondent Dharam , to pursue the present appeal. Amended memo of parties is State of , decided vide (HARKESH MANUJA) SANJAY GUPTA 2026.01.30 19:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document