Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10083 (JHR)

RINKU DAS ALIAS RINKU KUMAR DAS v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./11440/2025 · 2026-03-30

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:8974] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.11440 of 2025 ------ Rinku Das @ Rinku Kumar Das, Aged about 31 years, Son of Late Pitambar Das, Resident of Village Charghara, P.O. & P.S.- Sarwan, District- Deoghar .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Ankit Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shailendra Kr. Tiwari, Spl.P.P ------ Order No.04 Dated- 30-03-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No.124 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Section 319 (2), 318 (4), 336 (3), 338, 340 (2) and 61 (2) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 66 (B), 66(C), 66 (D) and 84 (C) of the Information & Technology Amendment Act, 2008. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in commission of cyber- fraud and the mobile phone recovered from the possession of the petitioner, was used in creation of several E-Wallets. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. Drawing attention of this Court towards para- 10 of the instant bail application, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. It is also submitted that the co-accused, with similar allegations, has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 20.03.2026 passed in B.A. No.181 of 2026. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 04.09.2025 as has been mentioned in para-12 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Spl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum-Cyber Crime, Deoghar in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No.124 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated- 30.03.2026-Animesh/