[2026:RJ-JP:25623] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9425/2026 URN: CRLMB / 17431U / 2026 Simanta Daas S/o Late Abaani Daas, Aged About 52 Years, R/o House Number 26, H.b. (Hem Barua Road), Paan Bazar, Police Station Paan Bazar Kaamru (Metro) Guwahati (Asam) (At Present In Central Jail, Jaipur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Deen Dayal Sharma Ms. Gayatri Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, P.P. Mr. Sneh Deep Khayaliya Mr. Narendra Singh Rathore (complainant present in person) HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA Order 08/07/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed against the order of the learned Trial Court dated 10.06.2026, on behalf of the accused-petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No.123/2026 registered at Police Station Manak Chowk, District Jaipur City(North), for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 308(4) of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case; that the accused-petitioner is a sick person and there are no criminal antecedent against accused-petitioner; that the accused-petitioner is in custody since long; conclusion of trial will take its own time, [2026:RJ-JP:25623] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-9425/2026] so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused- petitioner behind the bars and, therefore, prays that the accused- petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused- petitioner and concurs with the fact that there are no criminal antecedent registered against the accused-petitioner. Complainant Narendra Singh Rathore is present in person along with his counsel and submits that he has no objection if this bail application is allowed and further an affidavit is submitted to support the above mentioned contention, which is taken on record. 4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for both the parties; that the accused-petitioner is a sick person and complainant submits that he has no objection if the bail application is allowed; that there are no criminal antecedent registered against the accused-petitioner; that the accused- petitioner is in custody since 29.05.2026; that the trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 5. Therefore, the instant bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Simanta Daas S/o Late Abaani Daas, is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the [2026:RJ-JP:25623] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-9425/2026] satisfaction of the learned Trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve himself in any offence(s) during currency of the bail. 7. In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 8. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. 9. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned learned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J 59/Aman