Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10080 (UTT)

PANKAJ BHINDOLA v. AAMIR KHAN

WPMS/2481/2026 · 2026-08-17

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

UKHC010144052026 2026:UHC:7332 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMS/2481/2026 Pankaj Bhindola --Petitioner Versus Aamir Khan --Respondent Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. Sagar Kothari, Advocate for the petitioner. 2. According to petitioner, learned Trial Court has not considered Temporary Injunction Application filed by petitioner in Original Suit No. 88 of 2025. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that sole defendant in that suit has filed his written statement as well as objection to Temporary Injunction Application. 4. Having regard to the facts of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a request to learned Court concerned to make endeavour to decide the Temporary Injunction Application on any date, within six weeks from the date of presentation of certified copy of this order, provided what learned counsel for petitioner has stated, is correct. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 17.08.2026 Navin NAVEEN CHANDRA Digitally signed by NAVEEN CHANDRA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3be23325146e76a0642bdf4943fb9046f487df006da82a131bb4e4403d3c0a15, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=18167EEFB5CA8CFFD421A103819DA875643AF56D653D095C6ED9A86DAAB21CE5 , cn=NAVEEN CHANDRA Date: 2026.08.18 10:08:04 +05'30'