[2026:RJ-JP:8834] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 3310/2025 Chanchlesh Pankaj @ Chanchlesh Talaiyacha S/o Kanhaiyalal, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Raipura, Main Road, Varsha Car Washing Machine Ke Samne, Police Station Udyog Nagar, Kota City (Presently in J.C. at Central Jail, Kota) ----Appellant Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan Through Public Prosecutor 2. Ajay Meena S/o Badri Lal, R/o Rajnagar, Ps Borkhera, Kota, Udhyognagar, (Kota City), Kota City (Rajasthan) ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. Prakash Kumar Jha For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP TANEJA Order 25/02/2026 1. The present Criminal Appeal has been filed by the accused- appellant under Section 14(A)(2) of S.C. and S.T. (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, in connection with F.I.R. No.430/2025 registered at Police Station Udyog Nagar(Kota City) District Kota City for the offence(s) punishable under Section(s) 115(2), 117(2), 118(1), 126(2), 109(1), 324(4), 333, 189(2) of B.N.S, Section(s) 4/25 of Arms Act and Section 3(2)(v) & 3(2)(va) of SC/ST Act. 2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant has been falsely implicated in this case and he has nothing to do with the alleged offences. Learned counsel further submits that appellant has not been named in the FIR and no specific allegation [2026:RJ-JP:8834] (2 of 3) [CRLAS-3310/2025] has been assigned to him. Learned counsel also submits that as per injury report, injury sustained by the injured persons is not dangerous to life. 3. Learned counsel further contends that co-accused namely, Mahaveer Verma has already been enlarged on bail by a Coordinate Bench of this Court, vide order dated 24.01.2026, in S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.16957/2025. Learned counsel also submits that the appellant has no criminal antecedent, he is in custody since 29.10.2025 and no recovery is required to be made from him. He also submits that the charge-sheet has already been filed in the matter and conclusion of trial will take considerably long time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the appellant into custody, and therefore prays to enlarge the appellant on bail. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor submits that due information was given to the Respondent No. 2 about the hearing of this bail application, however, no one has appeared on his behalf to oppose the same. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the appellant. 6. Heard learned counsel for both the parties and perused the material available on record. 7. Taking into consideration the overall facts & circumstances of the case; the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the appellant; co-accused has already been enlarged on bail, charge-sheet has already been filed in the matter and trial will [2026:RJ-JP:8834] (3 of 3) [CRLAS-3310/2025] take considerably long time in its conclusion, this Court is of the opinion that the appellant deserves to be enlarged on bail. 8. Consequently, the instant appeal is allowed. The impugned order dated 11.12.2025, passed by the Special Court, SC and ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Cases, Kota, in Criminal Bail Application No. 240/2025 is set aside. It is ordered that the accused-appellant Chanchlesh Pankaj @ Chanchlesh Talaiyacha, S/o Kanhaiyalal arrested in connection with aforesaid F.I.R., shall be released on bail, if not wanted in any other case, provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- and two sureties of Rs. 25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the following conditions:- (i) The accused-appellant shall not tamper with evidence or influence the witness in any manner. (ii) The accused-appellant shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the Law. (iii) The accused-appellant shall attend the hearing of the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial Court or as and when asked to appear before the Trial Court. (iv) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail granted to the accused-appellant shall be liable to be cancelled. (SANDEEP TANEJA),J TN/74