Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1008 (PNJ)

HARJOT SINGH v. STATE OF UT. CHANDIGARH AND ANOTHER

CRM-M/36755/2025 · 2026-04-07

Manisha Batra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-36755 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT ( 133) HARJOT SINGH STATE OF UT. CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present: Ms. Indu Bala, Mr. Vaibhav Mittal, Additional PP, UT, Chandigarh MANISHA BATRA, J. (ORAL) 1. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks withdrawal of the petition, at this stage. 2. Permitted to do so. 3. Dismissed as withdrawn. 07.04.2026 Amit Sharma 36755-2025 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM Date of decision : 07.04.2026 HARJOT SINGH Versus STATE OF UT. CHANDIGARH AND ANOTHER HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Ms. Indu Bala, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Vaibhav Mittal, Additional PP, UT, Chandigarh **** A BATRA, J. (ORAL) After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks withdrawal of the petition, at this stage. Permitted to do so. Dismissed as withdrawn. (MANISHA BATRA) Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-36755-2025 (O&M) Date of decision : 07.04.2026 ... Petitioner CHANDIGARH AND ANOTHER ...Respondents HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Vaibhav Mittal, Additional PP, UT, Chandigarh After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner AMIT SHARMA 2026.04.07 17:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.