M/S. KASHISH DEVELOPERS LTD THR ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY CUM CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER NIRAJ KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
Cont.(Cvl)/246/2026 · 2026-04-02
Sanjay Prasad, Sujit Narayan Prasad
Contempt Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1008 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1008 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No.
( 2026:JHHC:9397-DB ) 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cont. Case (Civil) No. 246 of 2026
--------- M/s. Kashish Developers Limited (a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956/2013), having its registered office at 87, Old A.G. Colony, Kadru, P.O. Doranda, P.S. Argora, District Ranchi (Jharkhand), PIN 834003, through its Authorized Signatory cum Chief Financial Officer, namely, Niraj Kumar, aged about 48 years, son of Vishwanath Mishra, resident of 11-A, Saket Nagar, Near Royal Public School, Hinoo, P.O. and P.S. Doranda, District Ranchi, PIN 834002 (Jharkhand)
..… Petitioner
Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2.Shri Jayant Mishra, son of not known to the Petitioner, posted as Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, having its office at ‘Aaykar Bhawan’, Central Revenue Building, Main Road, P.O. Chita, P.S. Kotwali, District Ranchi-834001(Jharkhand) 3.Shri Sanjay Shivam, son of not known to Petitioner, posted as Commissioner of Income Tax (T.D.S.), Ranchi, having its office at ‘Aaykar Bhawan’, Central Revenue Building, Main Road, P.O. Chita, P.S. Kotwali, District Ranchi-834001 (Jharkhand)
….. Opposite Parties
---------- CORAM:HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD
---------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Sumeet Gadodia, Advocate
Mr. Shilpi Sandil Gadodia, Advocate
Ms. Nidhi Lall, Advocate
Ms. Shruti Shekhar, Advocate
Ms. Sanya Kumari, Advocate For the Opp.Parties: Mr. Kumar Vaibhav, Sr. S.C.
Mr. Durgesh Agarwal, Advocate
---------- 03/02.04.2026 Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the order dated 31.01.2023 passed in
Neutral Citation No.
( 2026:JHHC:9397-DB ) 2
W.P.(T) No. 919 of 2019, for non-compliance of which this contempt petition was filed, has been complied with and therefore, he does not intend to press this contempt petition. Such statement is made based upon the show- cause, which has been filed on behalf of the Income Tax Department, i.e. the Opposite Party.
2.
Under the circumstances, as the order dated 31.01.2023, passed in W.P.(T) No. 919 of 2019, has already been complied with, the instant contempt petition is closed and accordingly disposed of.
(Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.)
(Sanjay Prasad, J.) s.m. Dated 02.04.2026