GURUMOORTHY NATARAJAN v. DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT
BAIL APPLN./312/2026 · 2026-05-22
Anup Jairam Bhambhani
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10076 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10076 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 312/2026, CRL.M.(BAIL) 272/2026 & CRL.M.(BAIL) 429/2026 GURUMOORTHY NATARAJAN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. V. Siddharth, Advocate. versus DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT .....Respondent Through: Mr. Vivek Gurnani, Panel Counsel for ED with Mr. Kanishk Maurya and Mr. Ch. Abhinandan Patra, Advocates. CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI O R D E R % 22.05.2026 Mr. V. Siddharth, learned counsel for the petitioner submits, that during the pendency of the present interim bail petition, the learned trial court has granted regular bail to the petitioner vide order dated 21.05.2026 and the present petition has been rendered infructuous. Petition stands disposed-of as rendered infructuous. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed-of.
ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J MAY 22, 2026 ds This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 29/05/2026 at 10:46:44