Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10075 (UTT)

NITESH KUMAR PANDEY v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPMS/1978/2023 · 2026-08-18

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

UKHC010110282023 2026:UHC:7407 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMS/1978/2023 Nitesh Kumar Pandey --Petitioner Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J 1. Mr. Vinod Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. Mr. Suyash Pant, learned Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner makes a statement at the bar that the writ petition has become infructuous by efflux of time. 4. In view of the statement so made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed, as infructuous. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J) 18.08.2026 Aswal NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL Digitally signed by NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=eacc6757ee7881e933ff8934f07477005a a85f9802a3a08b08d1369512ea30f3, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=44EB54CBF00B7698CB6F10C2CE3 D26F5C22DACF4F4610C1FE58A58531726FBB0, cn=NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL Date: 2026.08.18 04:46:27 -07'00'