Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10072 (UTT)

JAI BISHT v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

ABA/296/2026 · 2026-08-06

Alok Mahra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

UKHC010123142026 2026:UHC:6961 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS ABA/296/2026 Jai Bisht --Applicant Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J. Mr. Vipul Sharma, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Pramod Tewari and Mr. Dinesh Chauhan, A.G.A. for the State of Uttarakhand. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that, in view of the protection already granted to the applicant against arrest, the applicant does not want to press the present anticipatory bail application at this stage. He, therefore, seeks permission to withdraw the present application, with liberty to avail such remedy as may be available in law, if occasion so arises. 3. Accordingly, the present anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as aforesaid. (Alok Mahra, J.) 06.08.2026 Arpan ARPAN JAISWAL Digitally signed by ARPAN JAISWAL DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=eabb68a3895e41937c266c23964c0485365445e3a20dddb739 3398f9fe45ba3e, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=060FC17022BEAE3DE215D68D9D454C5109CB98744635 1E4DF04AADAA2C2CEA66, cn=ARPAN JAISWAL Date: 2026.08.06 18:04:04 +05'30'