Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No.4166 of 2026
Decided on: 12th May, 2026 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ramesh Chand
…..Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P. and others
.....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Ms. Pallavi, Advocate vice Mr. Kul
Bhushan Khajuria, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Sikander Bhushan, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents No.1 to 5.
Mr. Digvijay Singh Bisht, Advocate, for respondent No.6. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
Petitioner had instituted this writ petition with the grievance that ejectment order dated 24.08.2022 issued against respondent No.6 was not being implemented and warrant of ejectment issued by the official respondents against respondent No.6 was not being enforced.
2.
During the course of today’s hearing, learned counsel for respondent No.6 submitted that the
1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes.
2
aforementioned ejectment order dated 24.08.2022 has now been stayed by the Divisional Commissioner, Mandi under
order dated 04.05.2026 passed in Revision Petition No.530 of 2025. The above has been confirmed by learned Deputy Advocate General on the basis of instructions dated 11.05.2026 issued by the Collector, Sub-Division Hamirpur alongwith compendium of documents, placed on record during hearing of the case.
3.
Since the law will take its own course, learned vice counsel appearing for the petitioner, in view of intervening developments, does not press this writ petition.
The writ petition to accordingly stand disposed of. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand
disposed of.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua May 12, 2026
Judge Mukesh