Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10070 (UTT)

SMT. PUSHPENDRA KAUR v. ASSISTANT COLLECTOR 1st CLASS RAMNAGAR

WPMS/2225/2018 · 2026-08-17

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

UKHC010081552018 2026:UHC:7355 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMS/2225/2018 Smt. Pushpendra Kaur --Petitioner Versus Assistant Collector 1st Class Ramnagar --Respondent Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. Suyash Pant, Standing Counsel for the State. Mr. Dharmendra Barthwal, Advocate on behalf of Mr. D.S. Patni, Senior Advocate appearing for the petitioner 2. By means of this writ petition, petitioner has sought a direction to correct the entries in revenue record. 3. Learned State Counsel submits that entries in revenue record cannot be corrected as prayed by petitioner, as the land in question is less than 2 kilometres from the periphery of reserve forest. 4. Mr. Dharmendra Barthwal, Advocate on behalf of Mr. D.S. Patni, Senior Advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that writ petition has now become infructuous. 5. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as infructuous. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 17.08.2026 Mahinder UKHC010081552018 2026:UHC:7355