SMT. PUSHPENDRA KAUR v. ASSISTANT COLLECTOR 1st CLASS RAMNAGAR
WPMS/2225/2018 · 2026-08-17
Manoj Kumar Tiwari
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10070 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10070 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
UKHC010081552018
2026:UHC:7355 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
WPMS/2225/2018 Smt. Pushpendra Kaur --Petitioner Versus Assistant Collector 1st Class Ramnagar --Respondent
Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. Suyash Pant, Standing Counsel for the State.
Mr. Dharmendra Barthwal, Advocate on behalf of Mr. D.S. Patni, Senior Advocate appearing for the petitioner
2. By means of this writ petition, petitioner has sought a direction to correct the entries in revenue record.
3. Learned State Counsel submits that entries in revenue record cannot be corrected as prayed by petitioner, as the land in question is less than 2 kilometres from the periphery of reserve forest.
4. Mr. Dharmendra Barthwal, Advocate on behalf of Mr. D.S. Patni, Senior Advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that writ petition has now become infructuous.
5. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as infructuous.
(Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 17.08.2026 Mahinder
UKHC010081552018
2026:UHC:7355