[2026:RJ-JP:26911] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2371/2026 URN: CRLMB / 4236U / 2026 1. Nandlal Meena S/o Shri Nanagram, Aged About 47 Years, R/o Siron Ki Dhani, Gaidrajsinghpura, Police Station Jamwaramgarh, District Jaipur Gramin. (Presently Accused Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur). 2. Arjunlal Meena S/o Shri Nanagram, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Siron Ki Dhani, Gaidrajsinghpura, Police Station Jamwaramgarh, District Jaipur Gramin. (Presently Accused Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dharmendra Kumar for Mr. Kapil Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP Mr. Mahendra Singh, ASI, PS Jamwa Ramgarh, Jaipur HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 15/07/2026 1. The petitioners have preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.183/2025 registered at Police Station Jamwa Ramgarh, District Jaipur Rural for offences under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 281, 109(1), 3(5) and 351(2) of BNS, 2023. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He submits tha though there is an allegation against the present petitioners of [2026:RJ-JP:26911] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-2371/2026] causing life-threatening injuries to the injured Mahadev but the statements recorded during the course of investigation reveal that the main allegation regarding infliction of injuries dangerous to life is not attributed to the present petitioners but to the Kapil, who has not been implicated in the present case. Petitioners are behind the bars since 09.12.2025 without any criminal past. Charge-sheet has already been filed. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners in further custody, consequently, the bail application deserves to be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioners but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners. 6. Consequently, the bail applications under Section 483 B.N.S.S. are allowed and it is directed that the petitioners Nandlal Meena S/o Shri Nanagram and Arjunlal Meena S/o Shri Nanagram, be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that each of them shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/130