Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10063 (ALL)

ABDUL RAHIM v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/38568/2026 · 2026-09-23

Ajit Kumar, Garima Prashad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 38568 of 2026 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J. HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J. 1. Heard Ms. Saniya Bano, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Gaurav Kumar Chaturvedi, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 2 & 3. 2. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, petitioner has prayed for following relief as substantial relief: "(i) Issue writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing and commanding the respondent no.2 to decide the petitioner's representation dated 24.10.2025." 3. It appears from the records that the petitioner has already represented the matter to the respondent no. 3 vide representation dated 24.10.2025 which is still pending consideration. 4. Learned Standing Counsel submits that he has no objection in the event this petition stands disposed of with a direction to the respondent no. 2 to look into and consider the grievance of the petitioner and pass appropriate order strictly in accordance with law. 5. In view of the above, this petition stands disposed of with a direction that respondent no. 2 shall consider the grievance of the petitioner raised in his representation and decide the same within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. September 24, 2026 Sachin Mishra Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Saniya Bano Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Gaurav Kumar Chaturvedi (Garima Prashad,J.) (Ajit Kumar,J.) Abdul Rahim .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SACHIN MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad