Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10062 (PNJ)

M/S BEST AGROLIFE LIMITED v. THE SUPERINTENDENT CGST DIVISION, SONEPAT

CWP/9668/2026 · 2026-04-29

Deepak Sibal, Rohit Kapoor

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No. 170 CWP-9668-2026 Date of decision : 29.04.2026 M/s Best Agrolife Ltd. .…. Petitioner Versus The Superintendent, CGST, Sonepat .... Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHIT KAPOOR Present : Mr. Sukhdeep Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Sidhi Bansal, Advocate, for the revenue. * * * * * DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral) 1. It is not disputed that to the show cause notice dated 30.06.2025 the petitioner had filed written response on 09.07.2025 which was ignored by the proper officer while passing the impugned adjudication order dated 03.11.2025. 2. In the light of the above, we have no hesitation to set aside the impugned adjudication order dated 03.11.2025 with liberty to the respondent(s)- revenue to proceed afresh against the petitioner in pursuance to the show cause notice dated 30.06.2025 but only after considering the written response filed by the petitioner on 09.07.2025 to such show cause notice and after affording opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner. 3. The petition is allowed in the above terms. [DEEPAK SIBAL] JUDGE 29.04.2026 [ROHIT KAPOOR] shamsher JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No SHAMSHER SINGH 2026.05.01 15:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and haryana high court, chandigarh