Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10061 (RAJ)

SMT. LAXMI RATHORE W/O PARMESHWAR SINGH PARMAR, S/O HARNATH SINGH v. SMT. PRIYA SINGH W/O SAMEER SINGH PARMAR

CW/19579/2024 · 2026-07-06

Sudesh Bansal

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:25021] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19579/2024 URN: CW / 41342U / 2024 Smt. Laxmi Rathore W/o Parmeshwar Singh Parmar, S/o Harnath Singh, Aged About 56 Years, R/o 3-F-23 Mahaveer Nagar, Vistar Yojana, Thana Mahaveer Nagar Kota (Raj.) Through Power Of Attorney Holder Jitendra Singh, S/o Jodha Singh, Aged About 48 Years, R/o 103, Gali No. 3 Krishna Nagar Thana Borkheda District Kota (Raj) ----Petitioner Versus 1. Smt. Priya Singh W/o Sameer Singh Parmar, Aged About 46 Years, Resident Of 132/5, Civil Lines Station Road, Thana Nayapura, Kota (Raj.) 2. Sameer Singh Parmar, S/o Chandrakant Singh Parmar, Aged About 48 Years, Resident Of 132/5, Civil Lines Station Road, Thana Nayapura, Kota (Raj.) 3. Chandrakant Singh Parmar, S/o Late Jodha Singh Parmar, Aged About 75 Years, Resident Of 132/5, Civil Lines Station Road, Thana Nayapura, Kota (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Singh Chauhan for Mr. R. K. Daga For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 06/07/2026 1. By way of filling instant writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, petitioner-plaintiff challenged an interlocutory order dated 13.11.2024 passed by the Additional Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate No.2 (North), Kota, dismissing an application filed by plaintiff, to record her evidence on commission. 2. Counsel for petitioner states that the original suit before the trial Court has been decided, therefore, in that view, the challenge [2026:RJ-JP:25021] (2 of 2) [CW-19579/2024] to the interlocutory order dated 13.11.2024 made in the present petition, has rendered infructuous. The factum of the civil suit having been decided, has also been affirmed by the status report dated 04.07.2026 received from the trial Court. 3. In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. 4. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, also also stand disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J Sachin Sharma/ S-113