1 / 2 2026:CGHC:19842 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3718 of 2026 1. Parmanand Rathore S/o- Joihan Singh Rajput, Working A Assistant Teacher (LB) Govt. Primary School, Devarhat R/o-132, Nahar Para, Vicharpur Mungeli Sukli (Chhattisgarh) 2. Jai Kumar Rajput S/o- Sevaram Rajput. Working As Assistant Teacher (LB) Govt. Primary School, Dhaniyadoli, R/o- Beechpara, Village Sardha, Post Sardha, Tahsil Lormi Sardha - Mungeli (Chhattisgarh) --- Petitioner(s) versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through - Secretary, Department Of School Education Mantralaya, Mahanadi, Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2. Director, Public Education, Directorate, Indravati Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, (C.G.) 3. District Education Officer, Mungeli, District- Mungeli (C.G.) 4. Block Education Officer, Lormi,district- Mungeli (C.G.) --- Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. K.P.S. Gandhi, Advocate For Respondent- State : Ms. Poorva Tiwari, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Order on Board 29/04/2026 1. Petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs. “10.1 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a mandamus writ orders or direction to the respondents authorities to be considered the representation of the petitioners in the light of WPS No. 3021/2023 of Rupesh Kumar Rajput and others vs. State of Chhattisgarh. 10.2 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a mandamus writ orders or PAWAN KUMAR JHA Digitally signed by PAWAN KUMAR JHA 2 / 2 direction to the respondents-authorities to be considered the name of the petitioners for promotion on the post of Head Master. 10.3 Any other relief may also be granted in favour of the petitioners as may deem fit by the Hon’ble Court as per the facts and circumstances of the case.” 2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that grievance of petitioner is of non promotion on the post of Headmaster. Aggrieved with which, petitioner has submitted representation before Respondent No. 3 which till date is pending consideration and therefore direction be issued to Respondent No. 3 to consider and take decision on the representation of petitioner dated 27.03.2026 (Annexure P-4) at the earliest within specific time frame. 3. Learned State counsel pleads that she is having no objection to the limited prayer made by learned counsel for petitioner. 4. On due consideration of nature of grievance raised, submission made by learned counsel for respective parties, this writ petition at this stage is dispose off, directing Respondent No. 3/ District Education Officer to consider and take decision on the representation submitted by petitioner, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a further period of 03 months from the date of receipt of copy of order passed by this Court. 5. With the aforesaid observation and direction, this writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge pwn