- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11616 WP No. 28496 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 28496 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SMT. LAKSHMAMMA W/O NAREPPA, AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS, (SENIOR CITIZEN) PERMANENT RESIDENT OF GHATTAHALLI VILLAGE, HOLLUR HOBLI, KOLAR TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT-563 116. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SATEESHA B.M., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, REP. BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER KOLAR DISTRICT-563 101. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER KOLAR SUB DIVISION, KOLAR TALUK, KOLAR. 4. THE THASILDHAR KOLAR TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT. Digitally signed by LAKSHMI T Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11616 WP No. 28496 of 2025 5. RAMACHANDRAPPA S/O VENKATASWAMY, 6. M. SRINIVASA REDDY S/O NARAYANAPPA, 7. ANJANAPPA S/O NAREPPA, 8. R. VENKATAREDDY S/O RAMAPPA, 9. C. NAGARAJ S/O CHIKKA NAREPPA, 10. M. SRIRAMAPPA S/O MUNIYAPPA, 11. SRIRAM REDDY S/O KRISHNAPPA, RESPONDENT NO.5 TO 11 R/AT GHATTAHALLI VILLAGE, HOLUR HOBLI, KOLAR TALUK, KOLAR. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. V. SESHU, HCGP FOR R1 TO R4) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO: (A) SET ASIDE BOTH IMPUGNED ORDERS PASSED IN RA.NO.118/2022 BY DEPUTY COMMISSIONER-KOLAR VIDE ORDER DATED 30/05/2023 AND AN IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED IN RA.NO.18/2004-05 BY ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER-KOLAR SUB DIVISION, KOLAR VIDE ORDER DATED 07-07-2015; AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11616 WP No. 28496 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER On 11.02.2026 the following order was passed: “Finally, two weeks time is granted to the petitioner for compliance of office objections, failing which, the writ petition shall be listed on 25.02.2026 for dismissal.” 2. Matter is called out. There is no representation for the petitioner. 3. Office objections have not been complied with. 4. Consequently, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-compliance of office objections. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE HB List No.: 2 Sl No.: 11