Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10048 (CAL)

MD. ARIF v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR.

WPA/8783/2026 · 2026-04-22

Saugata Bhattacharyya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

20 2222..0044..22002266 Ct. No. 05 adeb WPA 8783 of 2026 Md. Arif Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors. Ms. Shaib Afrin Mr. Rafat Jahan …for the petitioner Mr. Suman Sengupta Mr. Pradyut Kr. Das …for the State 1. Learned advocate representing the petitioner expresses grievance relating to manner of investigation conducted by the concerned police authority in connection with Alipore P.S. Case No. 37 dated 2nd April, 2024 under certain provisions of Indian Penal Code. 2. Petitioner prays for directions upon the police authority for expediting the investigation and submission of charge sheet. 3. However, Mr. Suman Sengupta, learned advocate representing the State respondents has filed a report dated 19th April, 2026 of officer-in-Charge, Alipore Police Station and same is taken on record. Copy of said report dated 19th April, 2026 is made over to the learned advocate representing the petitioner. 2 4. It is disclosed in the report dated 19th April, 2026 that Final Report True (FRT) was filed due to want of evidence against FIR named person. 5. In view of steps taken by the police authorities as disclosed in the report dated 19th April, 2026 no further order need be passed on this writ petition. 6. Writ petition stands disposed of. 7. However, this order shall not preclude the petitioner to take steps in accordance with law, if so advised. 8. Urgent photostat certified copy of the order, if applied for, be given to the parties, upon usual undertakings. (Saugata Bhattacharyya, J.)