HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 36589 of 2026 Court No. - 21 HON'BLE ARINDAM SINHA, J. HON'BLE SATYA VEER SINGH, J. 1. Mr. Ritaj Vikram Singh, learned advocate appears for petitioner and submits, his client belongs to scheduled caste 'Chamar'. There be interference with the rejection order, print of which is at page 39. His mother possesses caste certificate. The rejection was purportedly made because brother of his client made complaint on the portal alleging that since their father had left their mother and moved to Uttarakhand, the application ought to have been made in that State. 2. Mr. Amit Manohar, learned advocate, Additional Chief Standing Counsel appears for State. He submits, no evidence was furnished by petitioner and hence, impugned order should not be interfered with. 3. Petitioner says his mother has caste certificate. On query he draws attention to writing dated 27th July, 2026 for ascertaining petitioner's father also has caste certificate. 4. Impugned order at page 39 is set aside and quashed. Respondent no.4 is directed to give opportunity to petitioner for demonstrating his domicile in the State and that both his parents belong to scheduled caste 'Chamar'. Petitioner will produce certified copy of this order and his relevant Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ritaj Vikram Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Ayushman Choudhary .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) documents, to said respondent. Within three weeks of the communication either the caste certificate be issued or reason(s) for rejection thereof be informed to petitioner. 5. The writ petition is disposed of. September 28, 2026 Shiv WRIC No. 36589 of 2026 2 (Arindam Sinha,J.) (Satya Veer Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHIV KUMAR SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad