Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10044 (KAR)

KUMARACHAR H P v. TAHASILDAR

WP/36696/2025 · 2026-02-13

R Devdas

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:9170 WP No. 36696 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 36696 OF 2025 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN: 1. KUMARACHAR H P S/O LATE PUTTACHAR, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, HALLI MYSORE, HOLENARASIPURA TALUK, HASAN DISTRICT 573210 2. MOHAN KUMAR IS, S/O SHIVANNA, AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, ICHANAHALLI, HOLENARASIPURA TALUK, HASAN DISTRICT 573211 3. IE SWAMY S/O ERAPPA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, ICHANAHALLI, HOLENARASIPURA TALUK, HASAN DISTRICT 573211 4. HEMANTHKUMAR JS S/O SHIVANNA GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 32 EYARS, JAKANAHALLI, HALLI MYSORE HOBALI HOLENARASIPURA TALUK, HASAN DISTRICT 573210 Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:9170 WP No. 36696 of 2025 5. MANJUNATHA JS S/O SURESH AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, JAKANAHALLI, HALLI MYSORE HOBALI HOLENARASIPURA TALUK, HASAN DISTRICT 573210 6. SMT SUDHA W/O YOGESH AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, MANGALAPURA, HOLENARASIPURA TALUK, HASAN DISTRICT 573211 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. MANJUNATHA B., ADVOCATE) AND: TAHASILDAR HOLENARASIPURA TALUK HOLENARASIPURA, HASAN DISTRICT-573211 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. SHAMANTH NAIK, HCGP) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO-DIRECT TO THE RESPONDENT TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATIONS SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER VIDE ANNX-D1 TO D5 DTD 16.09.2025 AND CONSEQUENTLY DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO CHANGE THE KATHA IN THE NAME OF THE PETITIONERS/ RESPECTIVE PURCHASERS AS PER THE SALE DEEDS PRODUCED AT ANNX-A1 TO A6. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:9170 WP No. 36696 of 2025 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned High Court Government Pleader takes notice for the respondent. 2. The grievance of the petitioners is that their applications filed at Annexure-D series for re-entering their names in the revenue records pursuant to the dropping of the acquisition proceedings has not been considered by the respondent-Tahsildar and no orders have been passed till date, although the applications were filed in the month of September 2025. 3. Learned counsel points out to similar orders passed by the Tahsildar at Annexure - C series, where the Tahsildar has considered such contention that although the lands were notified for acquisition in the year 2012-13, nevertheless by virtue of a subsequent notification bearing - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:9170 WP No. 36696 of 2025 No.PÀA E ¨sÀÆ ¸Áé¼À 2014 dated 31.06.2016, the acquisition proceedings were dropped. Thereafter, the names of the applicants have been entered in the revenue records. 4. Having regard to the contentions raised by the petitioner, the Writ Petition stands disposed of with a direction to the respondent - Tahsildar, Holenarasipura Taluk to take up the applications filed by the petitioners and pass necessary orders as has been done in the case of the other applicants as found at Annexure-C series, and pass necessary orders as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE KA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 18