Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1004 (CHH)

Chunnilal v. Chaitram

SA/259/2017 · 2026-03-22

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:13695 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SA No. 259 of 2017 Chunnilal S/o Puniram, Aged About 55 Years R/o Village Pali, At Post Naila, Tehsil Janjgir, Distt. Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh ...............Defendant No.4, Chhattisgarh ... Appellant versus 1 - Chaitram S/o Murtiram, Aged About 35 Years R/o Village Shivni, Tehsil Janjgir, Distt. Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh ................Plaintiff, Chhattisgarh 2 - Gangaram S/o Vyas, Aged About 45 Years R/o Village Pali, Tehsil And Police Station Janjgir, Distt. Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh ..............Defendant No.1, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 3 - Gendram S/o Vyas, Aged About 68 Years R/o Village Pali, Tehsil And Police Station Janjgir, Distt. Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh ..............Defendant No.2, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 4 - Rohit Kumar S/o Tilakram, Aged About 45 Years R/o Village Pali, Tehsil And Police Station Janjgir, Distt. Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh ..............Defendant No.5, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 5 - State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Collector Janjgir, Distt. Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh .................Defendant No.6, District : Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents (Cause title is taken from CIS) 2 For Appellant : None For Respondent/State : Mr. Lekhram Dhruw, Panel Lawyer (Hon’ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru) Order on Board 23/03/2026 1. None appears nor any representation made on behalf of the appellant to press this appeal on repeated calls. 2. In view of the above, it appears that the appellant has lost interest in pursuing the present matter. 3. Accordingly, the present appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. SD/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) Judge Amardeep